# Game-Theoretic Foundations for Probability and Finance

by Glenn Shafer
and Vladimir Vovk.
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2019

Praise from early readers —
Errata —
Q&A with Glenn Shafer —
Technical notes

## Game-theoretic probability and finance come of age

Our first book, *Probability and Finance*, published in 2001,
showed that perfect-information games can be used to define mathematical probability.
Based on fifteen years of further research,
*Game-Theoretic Foundations for Probability and Finance*
presents a mature view of the foundational role game theory can play.
Its account of probability theory opens the way to new methods of prediction and testing
and makes many statistical methods more transparent and widely usable.
Its contributions to finance theory include purely game-theoretic accounts of Ito stochastic calculus,
the capital asset pricing model, the equity premium, and portfolio theory.

Ever since Kolmogorov's Grundbegriffe,
the standard mathematical treatment of probability theory has been measure-theoretic.
In this ground-breaking work, Shafer and Vovk give a game-theoretic foundation instead.
While being just as rigorous,
the game-theoretic approach allows for vast and useful generalizations of classical measure-theoretic results,
while also giving rise to new, radical ideas for prediction, statistics and mathematical finance without stochastic assumptions.
The authors set out their theory in great detail,
resulting in what is definitely one of the most important books on the foundations of probability
to have appeared in the last few decades.

— Peter Grünwald, CWI and University of Leiden
Shafer and Vovk have thoroughly re-written their 2001 book on the game-theoretic foundations for probability and for finance.
They have included an account of the tremendous growth that has occurred since,
in the game-theoretic and pathwise approaches to stochastic analysis and in their applications to continuous-time finance.
This new book will undoubtedly spur a better understanding of the foundations of these very important fields,
and we should all be grateful to its authors.

— Ioannis Karatzas, Columbia University
Errata and complements: our errors and things that can be improved.
A
condensed version appears on the featured section of
Statistics Views,
and a longer version is here.

This note by Jasper De Bock
provides a counterexample demonstrating that Axiom E6 in Proposition 6.9 cannot be removed.

This page is maintained by
Vladimir Vovk.
Last modified on 29 September 2024